Woolcombe is mentioned in the Domesday Book of 1086. During the 1960s the Austin family, then owners of Woolcombe Farm, became interested in the archaeological resource of their home and carried out some limited excavations. In 1966, encouraged by the Austins, George Rybot, an experienced fieldworker, began an archaeological investigation of the Woolcombe farmhouse and its adjacent fields. Rybot concentrated his efforts in a field called Lower Bottom which is to the west of the farmhouse and almost adjacent to it (see Figure 2).
Lower Bottom was of particular interest because it lay in a valley which was the source of the Woolcombe stream. Woolcombe means ‘valley of the spring’. Lower Bottom also contained a number of intriguing earthworks that resembled building platforms and it was supposed that collectively these platforms represented the site of a village or hamlet of the medieval period. In the bottom of valley there were signs of a track way that was thought to represent a medieval road. Woolcombe was considered to be an example of a Deserted Medieval Village (or DMV).
Ill-health brought George Rybot’s Woolcombe project to a premature end, but in 1984, Alan Hunt of the Dorset Institute of Higher Education (now Bournemouth University) began a new investigation with the support of Dinah Austin, the owner of the farm. As a prelude to this new project, Rybot’s site records were re-examined and a report was published by Jeanie Poulsen (1983, 77-81). Alan Hunt’s excavations at Woolcombe continued until 1992. As before, the field known as Lower Bottom was the principal focus of attention but in 1991 some new test pits and a trench were opened in what was known as the Kitchen Garden, just to the south of the farmhouse.
The archaeology of the Woolcombe ‘Kitchen Garden’ was somewhat confusing. Dinah Austin had reported that gardening activities had produced evidence of ‘a wall or walls at no great depth’ (Hunt 1992, 176). One Trench and five test pits were set out in the Kitchen Garden but the evidence from these was limited apart from the suggestion that there might have been a Bronze Age feature in this area.
By 1996, Woolcombe had been sold and the land holding had been partitioned. The new owner of the farmhouse wished to alter the layout of the building to some extent and to dam the Woolcombe stream in order to create a lake to the northeast of the farmhouse. The planning application required that an archaeological evaluation (limited excavation) and a watching brief should take place and Bournemouth University was awarded the contract for this work.
In 1997 a new trench was set out in the Kitchen Garden in order to clarify the nature of the archaeology in this area. This new work demonstrated that the area to the south east of the farmhouse had been drained by extensive pipe systems on at least two occasions and that earlier still (perhaps in the 18th-century) chalk rubble drains had been laid out. These chalk drains probably represent the features that had meen mistaken for ‘walls’ by Dinah Austin more than ten years earlier.
Iain Hewitt and Ana Gonzalez Ruiz have been reassessing the evidence of the Woolcombe excavations with a published report to follow in the Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society.